circular reporting and recycled news templates

Short Book Title : Achieving a more voluntary society

Chapter Title : circular reporting and recycled news templates

the situation can be intentionally contrived by the original source as a way of reinforcing the widespread belief in its information.

https://web.archive.org/web/20221220171801/https://www.definitions.net/definition/circular+reporting

in a few cases, the situation was believed to have been intentionally caused by the original source

https://web.archive.org/web/20221220172211/https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Circular_reporting

https://web.archive.org/web/20221220190827/https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Communication_of_falsehoods

Wrong terrorists or no terrorists?

A fake terrorist event is important because the media outlets will say that a group of people motivated by some ideology killed people but it does not matter what ideology.  These fake events can include but are not limited to mass shootings in public places like schools, colleges or malls or controlled demolition of buildings described as terrorist bombings or terrorist airplane strikes.  These fake events could also include fake insurrections by fake rioters.

As long as these events were said to be motivated by some ideology that is enough to justify censorship to prevent people from receiving information from the "wrong ideology."  False flag theories are acceptable because they only change the claim about which "wrong ideology" motivated an attack but do not deny that an attack was motivated by a 'wrong ideology" that needs to be censored.  Hoax theories maintain the claim that no one died in an event therefore censoring would not protect someone from being murdered in a fake event.  False flag theories maintain the claim that news outlets are basically trustworthy in that they posted about an event that really happened even if there is disagreement about who the perpetrators of the event really are.  Where as hoax theories maintain the claim that such an event did not really happen which is unacceptable because it asserts that news outlets are intentionally manufacturing fake news.  Hoax theories are further unacceptable because they assert that "conservative" and "liberal" news outlets are on the same team because neither is calling out the event as fake instead they are disagreeing about which "wrong ideology" motivated the event.  

I am not denying that real terrorists events happen.  Governments regularly execute people that should not be executed.  A war can be a real terrorist event that was justified as retaliation against a fake terrorist event.  In some high crime neighborhoods real violent events happen all the time but that does not receive as much news coverage as hoax terrorist events the news is perpetrating.  People other than the perpetrators will not know to get their cameras out ahead of time before a real crime occurs and smart perpetrators will not document their crimes on video but a massive number of journalist crisis actors can get their cameras out before a choreographed fake mass shooting.  I am also not denying that false flag events by saying that some events called false flags are not false flags but are actually hoaxes.

Tim Ozman has explained various methods in the movie industry to make fake events look realistic that could be used in the news.  Such things include but are not limited to costume design to look like a different race or gender, squibs that shoot fake blood, cushions to protect from falls that look dangerous, helium powered fake rockets that move to slow, inflated fake military tank vehicles  and computer generated images.

In addition by showing the means is available for news to fake events he also showed repeated patterns involved in news articles which suggest that news writers reuse old scripts but make small modifications on previous scripts to make them look like they are happening in the current year ( there is a chance I might be misrepresenting Tim Ozman here by accident but this is the simplest way I can explain the viewpoint he presented in a understandable manner. )

Based on my experience studying and observing religious groups labeled as cults, one cult leader from a group which I shall not name for safety reasons had members copy his sermon exactly but change details based on the date and location the sermons occur.  For example if there was someone name Joe who he liked and someone named David who he hated.  The sermon might be exactly identical but then contain a extra part like congratulations to Joe for doing ______ and is too sad that some people have done _______ where _______ is whatever David did last week, although if he is smart about it then he will not mention David by name but only whatever David did.  One Pastor did mention things his congregation members did by name describing their behavior as bad in sermons and got sued for it.

The news has a similar pattern.  Have a list of dates of the year like 9/11, 3/11 etc. that crisis happen on more often.  Have a list of types of stock characters that commit certain acts of evil.  Have a list of acts of evil.  Copy the numbers for 32, 33, 42, 119, 322, 666 or 911 from previous stories.  Combine those elements from previous news stories but change the date to the present year.  

News articles usually have jokes involving wordplay or visual symbols

A rocket launch being used as a phallic symbol as part of religious sex cult mythology

Any news about the planet "Uranus" being a joke about "your anus" or some reference to sex cult religious mythology.  For example a asteroid hit uranus and made "your anus" a tilted planet

Someone named "a mere lock" being shut by the police when "a mere lock" could have prevented them from breaking down the door and shooting him

Although numerology is not a valid science to know the future it is a tool for communication using numbers.  

Numerology is not a valid science but it is used in the news

For example viewing 13 as unlucky is not scientifically valid.  Why is viewing 13 as unlucky not scientifically valid?  Because one and one twelfth of a foot is the same distance as thirteen inches!  One and one twelfth of a foot is the same distance as thirteen inches so how can one and one twelfth  of a foot be a unlucky distance but thirteen inches not be a unlucky distance when it is the same distance?

However when communicating to a superstitious audience that is aware of the cultural convention of 13 meaning bad luck someone might intentionally choose to describe an object as 13 inches long and not as 1 foot and 1 inch long to communicate the number 13 in a coded message either to invoke fear or for comedic effect or maybe for some other reason.  A character in a movie might live on the 13th floor and have size 13 shoes and live in room number 13 on that floor and be shown to have bad luck events happen to them as a joke for example.

Tim Ozman has shown the scripts recycled in the news seem to repeat certain numbers too often to be without suspicion of fakeness which he claims is connected with the news media outlets displaying a religious worldview based on astrology and numerology.