Unnecessary wars and historical uncertainties

Overview

The Revolutionary War

This Revolutionary war might have been justified but if it was morally justified the current United States Federal Government is doing worse in certain ways than what King George did in order to justify such a revolution

The Civil War

Other War's between the United States and Britain

War's in which Britain and the United States worked together

Contemplate the possibility that literally every time the United States sided with Britain in a war after the revolutionary war they should not have?

World War 1

The United States getting involved in World War 1 over the sinking of a ship and there by starting world war 2 was stupid.  Some people were stupid enough to steer a ship through a area to close to a war zone so now we are going to kill even more people by sending them off to a war that was not defensive of people in the United States and made everything worse for Europe and completely could be avoided.

World War 2

Can we be certain that the historical claims used to justify United States and British involvement in World war 2 are correct?

People believe that Hitler was going to kill all the people of Jewish ancestry if the United States and Britain did not get involved in World War 2.  I will explain why some people believe Hitler never tried to genocide the Jews and why other people believed Hitler did try to genocide the Jews.  But first I will explain why some like Deborah Libstadt who is "President" Joe Biden's Anti Semtic monitoring appointed ambassador says those who say Hitler did not try to genocide the Jews should not be arrested for hate speech. 

Other people claim that Japan bombing pearl Harbor in a surprise attack meant world war 2 was justified.  I will explain why it was not a surprise attack.

Was World World 2 necessary?

Did the United States and Britain kill more Jewish civilians than they saved by participating in World War 2?  I will explain why I believe that the United States and Britain killed more Jewish civilians then they saved by participating in World War 2.  I will also explain why the United States and Britain killed more Gentile civilians then they saved by participating in World War 2.

Was the Korean war necessary?

If the United States was not involved in world war 2 there would be no Korean War.  I will try to explain why the United States involvement in the Korean War would not have occured without World War 2.

Some might argue that by involving themselves in World War 2 the United States saved Korea and China from Japan.  I will argue that the portion of Korea that is now North Korea might have been better off under Japanese rule than they are under their current administration as a result of United States involvement in World War 2 even if Japan really committed 100% of all the atrocities South Koreans and Chinese accuse them of having committed.  I will not make the claim that the part of Korea known as South Korea would be better off under continued Japanese rule if the United States was not involved.

I will also make the claim that China and the portion of Korea that is now North Korea would have been better off if the United States did not stop half way with the Korean war and comiitted to straight out completely invading China.  It would have been best if the United States never get involved with the Korean war in the first place by avoiding world war 2.  But if they were to get involved in the Korean war then it would have better if they committed all the way to the point of invading China.

The Soviet Union really were the bad guys during world war 2 and if Britain and the United States attacked the Soviet Union instead of Gernmany during world war 2 then China and the part of Korea now known as North Korea would have been better off to this day and the Korean war would have been avoided.

The Vietnam War

The war to make Israel a country

This would have been avoided if the United States and Britain did not provide impetus for a holocaust by siding with the Soviet Union "communists" and against Germany in World War 2.  People used the holocaust as an excuse to create the nation of Israel.  Ever since then numerous Jewish people have accused the "Jewish" State of Israel of committing a holocaust against the Palestinians.

Wars in Muslim countries

World War 3

The real third world war was discovered around 2019 or 2020 when "The Story Tellers" unleased a censorship pandemic against the general public.  World War 3 is a war of "The Story Tellers" against the general public.  It is a cold war where a alleged corona virus which some people have called a common cold has been used to censor the public.  This is similar to a previous so called cold war between Russia and the United States where "communists" were said to need to be censored at the same time as the United States implemented communist policies.  By which I mean the malignant involuntary strains of communism not the benign variations of communist philosophies which are voluntary.

The United States is claiming to go to war against Russia over Ukraine and this is a repeat of the previous cold war script in many ways.

Knowing how many of the previous United States wars were bad ideas in retrospect based on mainstream historical claims available to the public my guess is that the war by the United States against Russia over Ukraine will probably also be a bad idea in retrospect of future people if they are not too fully enslaved or destroyed by "The Story Tellers" by then too contemplate what happened then.

This might not actually be a normal physical war but a situation similar to the fake wars discussed in 1984 by Eric Blair or George Orwell.

Wars in detail

World War 2

Who is Deborah Lipstadt?

Deborah Lipstadt has taken a special position within the pro censorship administration of "President" Joes Biden to combat antisemitism.  Or in other Lipstadt's job is to increase antisemitism by suppressing free speech under the false pretense of decreasing anti semitism.

"Deborah E. Lipstadt was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on March 30, 2022 as the Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism, with the rank of Ambassador. As Special Envoy, she leads efforts to advance U.S. foreign policy to counter antisemitism throughout the world."

https://www.state.gov/biographies/deborah-lipstadt/

How is Lipstadt increasing anti semitism in the name of decreasing anti semitism? 

Presuming Lipstadt really exists and is not another fictional character like the actors, robots, holograms and or computer generated images that some people claim play "President" Biden and or "President" Trump and or other politicians who appear on media outlets let us examine if I am slandering Lipstadt's actions.  When refering to Lipstadt as will as all other celebrities I will try to avoid using gender pronouns so as not to presume their gender even if the sentence sounds awkward.

Now Lipstadt might deny being an ambassador of censorship but we all know that "President" Biden's team has been pushing for censorship.  Any information that Lipstadt "monitors" and labels as anti semitic will be used as an excuse by the media outlets controlled by "The Story Tellers" to censor free speech in the name of stopping anti semitism.  Actors pretending to be anti semites within "Story Teller"media outlets will then try to spread anti semitism by blaming all Jews as a collective whole for censoring people under the guise of stopping anti semitism.  When these actors pretending to be anti semite characters try to spread anti semitism there then will be a outcry from "Story Teller" media outlets for more censorship because of the anti semetic things these actors said.  This may also result in Jewish people or actors pretending to be Jewish people saying anti gentile things, which will be retaliated with by actors playing anti semites making anti semetic statements in response which will result in more outcry from "Story Teller" media outlets for censoring.  "The Story Tellers" who run things at the top of the pyramid might not actually be racist or religiously bigoted at all, but are willing to spread any sort of lie including racist and religiously bigoted lies to perpetuate excuses for censorship, so that they may censor evidence of their own wrong doing.

Even if Lipstadt has good pro free speech intentions and also good intentions to stop anti semitism by monitoring anti semitism for team Biden then at best Lipstadt is accidentally spreading antisemitism and suppressing free speech by her actions on behalf of team Biden.  At worst Lipstadt is intentionally spreading anti semitism and censorship.

Deborah Lipstadt's previous position on holocaust denial

"Famous Holocaust historian Deborah Lipstadt opposed criminalization of Holocaust denial in a debate at the Oxford Union Society last month, which is shown in the video below. Even after years of fighting a libel suit filed against her in 1996 by Holocaust denier David Irving, Lipstadt says she is not in favor of laws against Holocaust denial."

https://web.archive.org/web/20170719092817/https://forward.com/schmooze/333780/deborah-lipstadt-explains-why-holocaust-denial-shouldnt-be-a-crime/

“Who would define Holocaust denial? Who would write the legislation?….And then who rules? A judge who knows no history? A jury?”

https://web.archive.org/web/20170719092817/https://forward.com/schmooze/333780/deborah-lipstadt-explains-why-holocaust-denial-shouldnt-be-a-crime/

Did Deborah Lipstadt commit holocaust denial?

Even though Deborah Lipstadt wrote a book about how holocaust deniers are wrong.  Lipstadt has potentially broken holocaust denial laws and got away with it because Lipstadt is both not a gentile and not a christian.  If you are to claim what a "survivor" and "witness" of the holocaust says about the holocaust that they "survived" was true then in some countries you could be arrested and or fined for holocaust denial if you are a christian or a gentile.  Even if someone is of Jewish ancestry but converted to the religion of christianity they could be charged with the crime of holocaust denial.

Deborah Lipstadt denied the claims of a "witness" of the holocaust.  

Deborah Lipstadt said, 

"There is a Holocaust story making the rounds on the Internet which is clearly not true. It's about an inmate of a camp [a sub-camp of Buchenwald] who connects with a young girl outside the camp. She throws him an apple everyday over the fence. He tells her one day in May 1945 that she should not throw any more apples because at 10 a.m. the next morning he has appointment to appear at the gas chamber to be killed. This story has so many shortcomings that one hardly knows where to begin.

Let me focus only on the most fundamental one: Buchenwald had no gas chambers. In May 1945 no one was still being gassed."

http://web.archive.org/web/20201029015433mp_/https://lipstadt.blogspot.com/2007/12/apples-over-fence-holocaust-story-that.html

Deniers or Skeptics

Someone might say that Deborah Lipstadt did not deny the entire holocaust by being skeptical of things some people claiming to be witnesses said.  I am not claiming that Lipstadt is a skeptic of Jewish ancestry based execution orders by Hitler.  I am only claiming that Lipstadt is a skeptic of what that specific "witness" said in the story about the apple being given to him over the fence.

From now on out I will call people who believe that Hitler ordered the mass execution of Jews on the basis of their ancestry without any need for further evidence than we presently have "Believers."  "Believers" is short for "Jewish ancestry based execution order believers."

I will call those who say we should not believe that Hitler ordered the mass execution of Jews on the basis of their ancestry without proper reason and more or better evidence than is presently available "Skeptics."  "Skeptics" is short for "skeptics of Jewish ancestry based exection orders."

Context for these special defintions of Believer and Skeptic.

If the term Skeptic or Believer have the first letter capitalized when it is not at the beginning of a sentence it will denote this special meaning in this specific context.  If the term "Skeptic" or "Believer" is in quotation marks it will denote this special meaning in this specific context.  Quotation marks will be used to denote the special meaning of Skeptic or Believer when it is at the beginning of a sentence because all words are capitalized at the beginning of a sentence.  The specific meaning of Skeptic and Believer used in the section on the holocaust is only meant to apply to the section on the holocaust and not any other sections in this book.  The term skeptics and believers if used elsewhere have a different meaning throughout this book.

"Skeptics" do not deny everything every person claiming to be a eye witness says is true

Someone can be a Skeptic and believe that some things some people claiming to be survivors and witnesses of the holocaust said are true.  I am not claiming whether or not the believers or the skeptics are correct.  It could very well be possible that there is evidence such as a written order by Hitler to exterminate the Jews that has not been found yet or that has not been found by certain people yet.  Or some other sort of evidence of than ancestry based execution orders might exist that could potentially convince Skeptics to become Believers if found that has not yet been found.

Fine details involving who Skeptics claim was mass executed and why

The term ancestry based is very important.  Skeptics do not deny that individuals with Jewish ancestry who committed crimes might have been executed for their crimes.  They deny that they were mass executed for the crime of having Jewish ancestry.  

Mass execution by order from the top vs small scale murders in violation of the top down orders

Skeptics do not necessarily deny that some racist people or religiously bigoted people might have existed somewhere at some time during world war 2 who murdered some people for having Jewish ancestry or practicing benign forms of the Jewish religion.  But they would deny that such executions were following the official policies of the German Government as ordered from the top by level.  They would claim that if anyone did such a thing they would be in violation of the official German laws at the top level.  It could be possible that some person close to the bottom level ordered such a thing to some other person below them in ranking but if so such a order did occur it would be in violation of the law ordered from the top level according to Skeptics.

Execution for malicious religious and or maliciours political practices vs execution for having Jewish ancestry 

Skeptics deny that Jews were mass executed for practicing benign variations of the Jewish religion that do not pose harm to Christians or Gentiles.  

Skeptics do not necessarily deny that Jews were executed for practicing certain malignant variations of the Jewish religion if those variations involved religious practices that were criminal.  Some but not necessarily all Skeptics believe that at least some variations of the Jewish religion teach to do malicious actions against people who are not of Jewish ancestry.  

Some Skeptics might claim that some Jewish individuals were not executed for being Jewish but for spreading communism at a time shortly after a specific political system claiming to be communism led by a disproportionately Jewish group of people resulted in one or more events called the Holodomor or the Holodomores ( spelling ? ) resuled in a mass execution of far more than six million Christian Gentiles.  Such Skeptics would say those individuals would not have been executed if they did not commit such a crime as trying to Genocide gentiles or religicide Christians or try to spread a form of communism that would result in starvation or some other crimes.  

"Skeptics" do not deny that some individuals of Jewish ancestry might have been executed for malicious behavior that has nothing to do with Jewish religious practice

For example someone of Jewish ancestry claiming to practice a certain variation of Jewish religion might have violated the commands of that variation of Jewish religion by murdering another Jewish person and could have been executed for that by German government officials.

Claims involving executing disabled people vs claims of executing disabled people and people of Jewish ancestry

What I am calling Skeptics some other people have called holocaust revisionists or holocaust denialists.

I have not yet as of the time of writing this found anything published on a revisionist or holocaust denialist website claiming that people were not executed for having certain physical or mental disabilities in a program called Tiergarten or action T4.  Perhaps there are some people who also deny Tiergarten but I do not know of any.  So I am only refering to people who deny the execution of people based on Jewish ancestry as Skeptics.

Skepticism does not always mean anti semitism

Although there are certainly more than these four positions.

1 Believer who is Anti Semetic - This is the position that Hitler ordered the execution of people on the basis of having Jewish ancestry and that Jews were executed for having Jewish ancestry and that such a mass execution was a good thing

2  Believer who is not Anti Semetic - This is the position that Hitler ordered the execution of people on the basis of having Jewish ancestry and that Jews were executed for having Jewish ancestry and that such a mass execution was a bad thing

3 Skeptic who is Anti Semetic - This is the position that Hitler never ordered the execution of people on the basis of having Jewish ancestry and that Jews were not mass executed for having Jewish ancestry and that the absense of such a mass execution was a bad thing

4 Skeptic who is not Anti Semetic - This is the position that Hitler never ordered the execution of people on the basis of having Jewish ancestry and that Jews were not mass executed for having Jewish ancestry and that the absense of such a mass execution was a bad thing

Where do I stand on this?

I think that if people are, were, will be or would be mass executed on the basis of having Jewish ancestry that that is, was, will be or would be a bad thing.  I think that if people are, were or would be mass executed on the basis of having Gentile ancestry that that is, was, will be or would be a bad thing.

Do I think Hitler was a good guy or a bad guy?  Or did Hitler even exist?

I am not sure if Hitler even existed or if he was a character created by the story tellers and played by actors or fabricated by other means in order to influence the behavior of people.  We already have clear evidence that Joe Biden is not one single real individual but may be a character played by multiple actors or created using movie magick such as computer generated images or other such magick.  So, why should I believe Hitler existed either?  

If Hitler really existed and we knew what actions he really took then we can debate whether or not certain actions he took were moral or immoral based on different moral viewpoints.  

My viewpoint on the alleged Tiergarten or Action T4 mass execution of disabled people is that it is a bad thing based on my current limited understanding of the alleged circumstances.  But people to this day have argued for the abortion or exection of disabled babies and the sterilization of certain disabled people or genetic groups of people without their consent so the alleged Tiergarten policies are not out of place with many of the moral systems taught in media outlets by "The Story Tellers."

Even if his policies like Tiergarten or Action T4 were bad we should not assume every policy he implemented was bad.  Some people believe his economic policies resulted in less death from starvation and more economic prosperity than if the previous policies or status quo policies which were causing mass starvation were continued.

Why I am less emotionally biased than most people in evaluating historical claims about Hitler

Most people wish to portray Hitler as a hero or villain and are therefor more emotionally biased when trying to process whether or not Hitler ordered the mass execution of Jewish people based on their ancestry.  I am not interested in proving that Hitler was a Hero or a Villain because I am open to the possibility that Hitler did not exist.

In the context of this section between bold headings the phrase "the holocaust occured" means the mass execution of individuals because of Jewish ancestry based on German Government order during world war 2 occured.

Some people might want to believe the holocaust occured so they can be good people for believing it occured and might refuse to look at the alleged evidence against the holocaust.  Other people might want to believe the holocaust did not occur so that it can not be used as an excuse to censor anything some organization labels as needing to be censored to prevent another holocaust and might refuse to look at the alleged evidence in support of the holocaust.  Some might not want to believe the holocaust occured because they have heard other people use the holocaust as an excuse to genocide or religicide White Christian Gentile Cis Gendered Males and might refuse to look at the alleged evidence in support of the holocaust.

Many people believe that claiming the holocaust occured or did not occur reflects on their moral character but I have no such belief.  I know that believing the holocaust did not occur would not make me a bad person who wants the holocaust to happen.  I know that believing the holocaust did occur would not make it morally justifiable to censor everything some organization labels as needing to be censored to prevent another holocaust.  I know that believing the holocaust did occur would not make it nor morally justifiable to oppress, genocide or religicide White Christian Gentile Cis Gendered Males in the name of preventing another holocaust.

Educated Skeptics vs Educated Believers reasons for doubt or faith in the mass execution of Jews on the basis of their ancestry

Copyright Carl Janssen 2023